Tell me about a decision you'd already made that people senior to you wanted reversed. How did you defend it, and where did it land?
Why this works
Defending a live decision under senior pressure is different from selling an idea: the cost of being wrong is now personal, and folding is always the comfortable move. The question shows whether the candidate can hold a position on its merits — and tell conviction apart from stubbornness.
Follow-up probes
- What would have changed your mind?
- What did you concede, and what did you refuse to?
- What did defending it cost you with those people?
What good looks like
The decision restated in the objectors' terms, a genuine answer to "what would change your mind", and an outcome they own either way — held with reasons or reversed on evidence, not on rank.
Red flags
A position held to avoid losing face, capitulation the moment rank appeared, or a telling absence of any story where holding the line was the wrong call.
More Communication & influencing questions
All 12 communication & influencing questions
Related across competencies
Build the interview around it
One vetted question is an ingredient, not the meal. Plan the interview and three short steps will work out which competencies your role needs, no account required. Or subscribe and get new vetted questions and interview guides as we publish them.