Tell me about a decision of yours that turned out badly. With what you knew at the time, was it still the right call?

Separating decision quality from outcome luck is the core of judgment — bad outcomes follow good process and vice versa. Candidates who can re-run the decision with only what was knowable then are the ones who learn from results instead of just flinching from them.

• What did you know then, and what only became clear after?
• What in your process, not the outcome, would you change?
• What did cleaning it up involve?

A costly example owned without hedging, a clean separation of what was knowable from hindsight, and a specific process change — a check added, a threshold moved — rather than a vow to choose better.

Every bad outcome is blamed on information nobody could have had, the lesson is "trust my gut more" with nothing concrete behind it, or the example is picked so they were barely responsible.